E Griffiths v IKEA Ltd: 6003863/2025

The Respondent says the reason was conduct, a potentially fair reason under ss.98(1) – (2) ERA. 3. If the reason was conduct, did the Respondent act reasonably or unreasonably in all the circumstances, including its size and administrative resources, in treating that as a sufficient reason to dismiss the Claimant (s.98(4) ERA)? In particular: 3.1. Did the Respondent have a genuine belief that the Claimant was guilty of misconduct? 3.2.